I’ve got a few things to blow off a little steam about today.
First I’m going to tackle the minor flap that popped up in the comments section of Witchfire’s post about Wonder Woman. Absolutely NOT mad at anybody. Those who commented did a nice job of being polite in their disagreement. It’s simply easier to reply to the overall theme of the replies here in one reply, and expand on my beliefs. Comments are kind of limited after all. 😎

To be honest, I was surprised how many people rushed to Marston’s defense. If one looks at those early Wonder Woman comics, it’s pretty clear the emphasis was on submission, with being a strong woman being secondary, even if it is still central to the character.
The NPR story linked to in one comment said Marston took inspiration from suffragettes and centerfolds alike. The trouble with NPR’s assertion is that Marston stopped writing Wonder Woman in 1947. The first issue of Playboy didn’t hit the news stands until late 1953. Ergo, there were no centerfolds to influence Marston.
Bottom line; NPR was more interested in pushing an agenda of sexual libertarianism than the truth. Facts matter.
Let me be blunt, both of us here LOVE everything about sex. There’s NO issue at all on that level. Our only two caveats is everything should be consensual (which automatically precludes children and animals), and it should ideally stay in private. Beyond that, your kinks don’t matter, nor does your orientation. Do what you want, just don’t hurt or use others, OR try to force your lifestyle on others.
For us, it’s more about reality and giving Marston credit for what Wonder Woman evolved into in the 77 years since he was at the helm of the comic book.
This:

and THIS:

Are NOT about female empowerment. They are about the titillation of being able to “break” and control an otherwise strong woman. THAT was Marston’s fetish. It was how he ran his household with his wife and mistress. It’s also honestly the same thing that drives the superheroine peril (rape) sites that are out there today, albeit on a far less toxic level than some of them.
Things like a bridle bit in the mouth and Wonder Woman grinning and blushing while a child takes a hair brush to her ass are NOT about female empowerment or a strong female lead.
Did Marston push the envelope with the character? Absolutely! Up till that point, women were in stories strictly to be the helpless damsel in distress that the real hero rescued, often from perils caused by her own headstrong nature.
Even Diana’s costume was considered “scandalous” and indecent” at the time. Kind of amusing in that regard that nobody in the first Wonder Woman movie reacts to Diana’s costume. World War 1 was a time when women’s fashion had barely progressed past the point of it being scandalous for a woman to show an ankle from underneath her dress. Yet Diana’s armor is treated as completely normal, LOL. The formal ball towards the end oof the movie has her wearing a modern (ie very clingy) evening gown also.
We’re getting off track here however. The point is that yes, Marston took some risks and got some definite blowback from it all. He had a real impact on the idea of female superheroes also.
Wonder Woman was hardly the first female superhero character though. The Blonde Phantom, Sheena Queen of the Jungle, Phantom Lady (who appeared years before Wonder Woman), Marvel’s original Miss America (who fought alongside Cap in WW2 as part of Tthe Invaders), the original Dinah Drake Lance version of Black Canary, Namora (the Submariner’s cousin) and others all made their debuts around the same time as Diana / Wonder Woman.
Some of them, like Sheena and Namora, were dressed in equally revealing outfits as well. They didn’t get the same level of blowback because there was no BDSM agenda being pushed.
Getting back to Wonder Woman herself… The character didn’t truly get away from the bondage theme until the late 80s / early 90s. People went “OMG!” the first time Diana broke chains after letting herself be bound by men (and then promptly kicking the snot out of them, lol). It’s been so long though that people see the modern Wonder Woman and simply assume that she’s the same character she always was.
Nothing is further from the truth. Even Captain America has undergone major changes over the years. Back in his WW2 days, he was a propaganda piece as much as anything. The U.S. was the greatest, and he was there to defend it against the nazi hordes. By the time the late 80s came around, and Marvel had the Government try to conscript him into service, he decided that forcing a citizen to work for the government was wrong, and he told the President “I’m only loyal to the dream, sir” before turning in his uniform.

So yeah… Knowing Wonder Woman’s history much better than the writers at NPR, I don’t see Marston as a feminist saint. He’s NOT evil by any means either, but he did use the character to push his fetish.
And Then There was The Batman…

One of my commenters yesterday hit a trigger for me. Most likely unintentionally as well, as the comment was vague enough to not fully imply if it was about escape artist training OR that there was something sexual going on between Batman and Robin.
That gay rumor has been around FOREVER, and I’ve always felt it’s completely unjustified and unproven. What’s worse is that the greater implication is that any single parent adoption, especially by men, is all about pedophilia. In 2017 alone, there were 17,000 adoptions by single parents. ALL of whom went through a ton of extra scrutiny to make sure pedophilia wasn’t an issue.
Likewise, there have been over 1000 issues of Detective Comics since it debuted in 1939, and God only knows how many total issues of the numerous other Batman focused titles over the years. Bruce has plenty of other baggage, but he’s never once been shown to be gay or a pedo.
Tying That Into the State of Society in General:
I’m not even going to blame any “gay agenda” on this either. I believe it started with and is, for the most part, driven by snarky, cynical people who can’t accept the idea of role models or that others could actually do good for it’s own sake. The same kind of people that say Captain America has to be racist because he’s white and that Superman makes a better villain, or Luke would actually try to assassinate his own nephew.
The sad part is, this kind of thinking is becoming so commonplace that most of us just go along with it and never ask why.
Without getting into a long side discussion, suffice it to say there’s a long running effort to tear down anything resembling role models and cultural icons in society. That’s part of why Bruce’s character has devolved into somebody who can’t trust and has contingencies against all his allies and “friends”.
But really… What this all comes down to for me is that if we want to start improving society, is has to start by eliminating all the toxic thinking in it. AND question EVERYTHING we’re told, no matter the source. Journalism is dead on all sides, replaced by agenda driven spin.
Those Damned A.I.s
Yes, I’m still fighting to get artwork to turn out the way I want. A perfect example of my frustrations is the Wonder Woman picture above. Overall Bing did a fabulous job. The necklace isn’t canon, but I like the look. Diana didn’t even have those wings on her tiara is when she had Thor’s hammer in the BIG Marvel & DC crossover event decades ago:

ANYWAY… I clicked on the wings, told Bing to remove them, and what do I get?

The flipping Archangel Diana! With two lassos and a whip to boot. No matter what I tried in the editor, I could not get rid of those damned wings either.

OK, that’s a long enough rant. Time for me to shut up…









































